Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To evaluate computerized adaptive testing (CAT) measures of rehabilitation outcomes. Design: Physical functioning questions were calibrated via item response theory (IRT) and administered with CAT software.: 485 adults interviewed during postacute care rehabilitation (simulation study) and 26 adults who completed CAT and personal interviews (CAT pilot study). Outcome Measures: Patient acceptance and respondent burden, reliability, and discriminant validity.: In the simulation study, CAT-based estimates correlated highly (r=.93 and r=.98) with criteria, minimized ceiling and floor effects, and reduced respondent burden while achieving high reliability. Pilot study patients preferred self-administered CAT surveys, and CAT scores discriminated well across severity levels.: CAT software has considerable potential to improve physical functioning measurement in rehabilitation settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ware et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: