Key result
The band-pass optical flow (BPOF) method provided accurate myocardial strain estimates and surpassed the harmonic phase (HARP) method at the myocardial boundaries.
Why the study?
Does the band-pass optical flow (BPOF) method improve the accuracy of myocardial strain measurement compared to the harmonic phase (HARP) method?
Does the band-pass optical flow (BPOF) method improve the accuracy of myocardial strain measurement compared to the harmonic phase (HARP) method?
The band-pass optical flow method offers a more accurate alternative to the harmonic phase method for measuring myocardial strain from MRI tagging, particularly at myocardial boundaries.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BPOF may improve boundary strain accuracy in tagged MRI; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive imaging modality for providing information about the myocardial function, viability, and morphology. One of the most common MRI techniques is myocardial tagging, based on which deformation of the myocardium can be quantified. Different measures of regional cardiac function, e.g. strain, can thus be calculated to provide information about wall motion abnormality. In this paper, we investigate the performance of the band-pass optical flow (BPOF) method for measuring myocardial strain and compare the results to the commonly used harmonic phase (HARP) method. The results show that BPOF provides accurate strain estimates and surpasses HARP at the myocardial boundaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassanein et al. (2015) studied Myocardial function assessment. Band-pass optical flow (BPOF) method vs. Harmonic phase (HARP) method was evaluated on Myocardial strain measurement accuracy. The band-pass optical flow (BPOF) method provided accurate myocardial strain estimates and surpassed the harmonic phase (HARP) method at the myocardial boundaries.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: