Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper we investigate, using high resolution N-body simulations, the density profiles and the morphologies of galaxy clusters in seven models of structure formation. We show that these properties of clusters are closely related to the occurrence of a significant merging event in the recent past. The seven models are: (1) the standard CDM model (SCDM) with Ω₀ = 1, Λ₀=0 and $h=0.5$; (2) a low-density flat model (FL03) with Ω₀=0.3, Λ₀=0.7 and $h=0.75$; (3) an open model (OP03) with Ω₀=0.3, Λ₀=0 and $h=0.75$; (4) a low-density flat model (FL02) with Ω₀=0.2, Λ₀=0.8 and $h=1$; (5) an open model (OP02) with Ω₀=0.2, Λ₀=0 and $h=1$; (6) a low-density flat model (FL01) with Ω₀=0.1 and Λ₀=0.9; (7) an open model (OP01) with Ω₀=0.1 and Λ₀=0. We find that the density profiles and morphologies of clusters depend both on Ω₀ and on Λ₀. For Λ₀=0, these properties are a monotonic function of Ω₀. Clusters in OP01 have the steepest density profiles, their density contours are the roundest and show the smallest center shifts. The other extreme case is SCDM, where clusters show the least steep density profiles and the most elongated contours. For a given Ω₀ ($<1$), clusters in the flat model (i.e. with Λ₀=1-Ω₀) have flatter density profiles and less substructures than in the corresponding open model. In particular, our results show that low-density flat models with Ω₀~ 0.3, which are currently considered as a successful alternative to SCDM, can produce a substantial fraction of clusters with substructures. This is in contrast to the conception that this kind of models may have serious problem in this aspect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jing et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: