Key result
Athletic participation in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators carries potential risks of inappropriate shocks and device injury, requiring specific considerations and recommendations.
Why the study?
Is athletic participation safe for athletes with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator?
Is athletic participation safe for athletes with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator?
Athletic participation in ICD patients carries potential risks such as inappropriate shocks and device injury, requiring careful consideration and specific recommendations.
Requires individualized counseling for athletes with ICDs; leaves open optimal eligibility criteria pending prospective data.
Although athletic participation lowers cardiovascular risk and improves quality of life, it may represent a hazard in high-risk group athletes such as those with cardiac abnormalities receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). ICD sports participants are exposed to the potential risk of inappropriate shocks due to sinus tachycardia and other supraventricular arrhythmias during exertion as well as device injury. The safety of athletic participation of ICD-patients is not completely defined and ICD efficacy in interrupting malignant arrhythmias during intense exercise is partly unknown. This explains difficulties in current recommendations made by physicians, given the associated potentially ischemic, autonomic and metabolic conditions. The scope of this review is to underline specific considerations including potential risks and recommendations for athletic participation in this patient-group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mascia et al. (2014) conducted a review in Athletes with cardiac abnormalities receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Athletic participation was evaluated. Athletic participation in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators carries potential risks of inappropriate shocks and device injury, requiring specific considerations and recommendations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: