Key result
Stentless porcine valves yielded similar left ventricular mass index at 6 months compared to stented valves (142 vs 131 g/m2), despite greater reductions in peak aortic velocity (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does a stentless porcine valve improve left ventricular mass regression compared to a stented porcine valve in adults undergoing aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis?
RCT (n=190)
Does a stentless porcine valve improve left ventricular mass regression compared to a stented porcine valve in adults undergoing aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis?
Stentless porcine valves do not provide superior left ventricular mass regression compared to stented valves at 6 or 12 months, despite offering better hemodynamic profiles.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Stentless valves confer no LV mass regression benefit over stented valves; challenges assumptions that superior hemodynamics drive better remodeling post-AVR.
BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the established treatment for severe aortic stenosis. In response to the long-term results of aortic homografts, stentless porcine valves were introduced as an alternative low-resistance valve. We conducted a randomized trial comparing a stentless with a stented porcine valve in adults with severe aortic stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: The primary outcome was change in left ventricular mass index (LVMI) measured by transthoracic echocardiography and, in a subset, by cardiovascular MR. Measurements were taken before valve replacement and at 6 and 12 months. Patients undergoing AVR with an aortic annulus < or =25 mm in diameter were randomly allocated to a stentless (n=93) or a stented supra-annular (n=97) valve. There were no significant differences in mean LVMI between the stentless versus stented groups at baseline (176+/-62 and 182+/-63 g/m2, respectively) or at 6 months (142+/-49 and 131+/-45 g/m2, respectively), although within-group changes from baseline to 6 months were highly significant. Changes in LVMI measured by cardiovascular MR (n=38) were consistent with the echo findings. There was a greater reduction in peak aortic velocity (P<0.001) and a greater increase in indexed effective orifice area (P<0.001) in the stentless group than in the stented group. There were no differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 valve groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant differences in indexed effective orifice area and peak flow velocity in favor of the stentless valve, there were similar reductions in left ventricular mass at 6 months with both stented and stentless valves, which persisted at 12 months.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arenaza et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in Severe aortic stenosis (n=190). Stentless porcine valve vs. Stented supra-annular porcine valve was evaluated on Change in left ventricular mass index (LVMI). Stentless porcine valves yielded similar left ventricular mass index at 6 months compared to stented valves (142 vs 131 g/m2), despite greater reductions in peak aortic velocity (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: