Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ability of human observers to detect a thermal-noise signal (S) as a function of the duration of S presented in a thermal-noise background has been studied. Subjects were asked to correctly identify, in a two-alternative forced-choice situation, the time interval in which S occurred. Signal-to-noise ratios in dB based on a steady-state voltage (S/N), were varied according to the subject's performance on a block of 12 trials. The S/N was varied in 1-dB steps until a 75% correct-detection level was maintained. This Block Up and Down, Two-Interval, Forced-choice (BUDTIF) procedure is described in detail. Threshold S/N's obtained decreased linearly with increase in log duration from 1.0 to 100 msec, then approached minimum of −9.4 dB at 1000-msec duration. When these same threshold S/N's are converted to increments [(S+N)/N] and expressed in dB a linear decrease with log time from 1.0 to 47 msec is seen with an abrupt discontinuity, then a further nearly linear decrease from 47 to 1000 msec. The question is raised whether S/N or [(S+N)/N] is the effective stimulus to the subject.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard A. Campbell (1963) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: