Key result
Protocol outlines upcoming scoping review on multicomponent rehabilitation for elderly independence and functional capacity.
Why the study?
The efficacy of multicomponent rehabilitation in improving functioning-related outcomes in elderly patients hospitalised for age-related diseases remains unclarified.
Does centre-based multicomponent rehabilitation improve care dependency in patients ≥75 years of age hospitalised for age-related diseases compared to usual care?
Systematic Review
Does centre-based multicomponent rehabilitation improve care dependency in patients ≥75 years of age hospitalised for age-related diseases compared to usual care?
This is a protocol for a scoping review to evaluate the efficacy of multicomponent rehabilitation on care dependency and functioning in elderly patients hospitalized for age-related diseases.
Protocol does not change practice for elderly rehabilitation; leaves open effects on independence pending evidence mapping.
INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients after hospitalisation for acute events on account of age-related diseases (eg, joint or heart valve replacement surgery) are often characterised by a remarkably reduced functional health. Multicomponent rehabilitation (MR) is considered an appropriate approach to restore the functioning of these patients. However, its efficacy in improving functioning-related outcomes such as care dependency, activities of daily living (ADL), physical function and health-related quality of life (HRQL) remains unclarified. We outline the research framework of a scoping review designed to map the available evidence of the effects of MR on the independence and functional capacity of elderly patients hospitalised for age-related diseases in four main medical specialties beyond geriatrics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The biomedical databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, ICTRP Search Platform, ClinicalTrials) and additionally Google Scholar will be systematically searched for studies comparing centre-based MR with usual care in patients ≥75 years of age, hospitalised for common acute events due to age-related diseases (eg, joint replacement, stroke) in one of the specialties of orthopaedics, oncology, cardiology or neurology. MR is defined as exercise training and at least one additional component (eg, nutritional counselling), starting within 3 months after hospital discharge. Randomised controlled trials as well as prospective and retrospective controlled cohort studies will be included from inception and without language restriction. Studies investigating patients <75 years, other specialties (eg, geriatrics), rehabilitation definition or differently designed will be excluded. Care dependency after at least a 6-month follow-up is set as the primary outcome. Physical function, HRQL, ADL, rehospitalisation and mortality will be additionally considered. Data for each outcome will be summarised, stratified by specialty, study design and type of assessment. Furthermore, quality assessment of the included studies will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and/or international congresses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GFK5C.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baritello et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Elderly patients hospitalised for common acute events due to age-related diseases. Centre-based multicomponent rehabilitation (MR) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Care dependency. This is a protocol for a scoping review designed to map the available evidence of the effects of multicomponent rehabilitation on independence and functional capacity in elderly patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: