Key result
Intravenous ibutilide reduced the number of required cardioversions/defibrillations from 20 to 0.7 shocks (P=0.036) in patients with refractory VT/VF and myocardial ischemia.
Why the study?
Recurrent VT and VF in patients with myocardial ischemia requiring hemodynamic support can be refractory to available antiarrhythmic agents, cardioversion, and defibrillation.
Does intravenous ibutilide reduce the number of required cardioversions/defibrillations in patients with refractory VT/VF, myocardial ischemia, and hemodynamic instability?
Observational (n=6)
Does intravenous ibutilide reduce the number of required cardioversions/defibrillations in patients with refractory VT/VF, myocardial ischemia, and hemodynamic instability?
Intravenous ibutilide may be an effective last-resort antiarrhythmic to reduce defibrillation burden in patients with refractory VT/VF storm and myocardial ischemia requiring mechanical hemodynamic support.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support ibutilide as last-resort adjunct in refractory ischemic VT/VF storm; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before practice change.
Introduction Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients with myocardial ischemia requiring hemodynamic support can be refractory to available antiarrhythmic agents and even to cardioversion and defibrillation. The purpose of this study was to report the effect of intravenous ibutilide in patients with a VT and/or VF storm in the presence of incomplete revascularization requiring hemodynamic support. Methods and results Standard continuous telemetry and frequent 12‐lead electrocardiograms were obtained to determine the effect of intravenous Ibutilide in these patients. We studied six consecutive patients (age 60 ± 12 years; five males) with incomplete revascularization and mechanical support (extracorporeal membrane of oxygenation = 2; left ventricular assist device = 4) with VT/VF refractory to lidocaine and amiodarone. Intravenous ibutilide was given as a last resort for management of their ventricular arrhythmias. Intravenous ibutilide (1‐2 mg) allowed restoration of sinus rhythm in three patients with persistent VF that were refractory to multiple defibrillation shocks. When the 24‐hour period before and after ibutilide administration was compared, this drug markedly reduced the number of required cardioversions/defibrillations in all patients from 20 ± 9 to 0.7 ± 0.8 shocks ( P = 0.036). Conclusions In patients with myocardial ischemia requiring hemodynamic support, intravenous Ibutilide demonstrates a potent antiarrhythmic effect and can facilitate defibrillation in patients with refractory VF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sendra‐Ferrer et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Refractory ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation with myocardial ischemia and hemodynamic instability (n=6). Intravenous ibutilide vs. 24-hour period before administration was evaluated on Number of required cardioversions/defibrillations (p=0.036). Intravenous ibutilide reduced the number of required cardioversions/defibrillations from 20 to 0.7 shocks (P=0.036) in patients with refractory VT/VF and myocardial ischemia.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: