Key result
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) detected increased prefrontal activity during emotional experience and regulation in most studies, though findings for emotion perception were inconsistent.
Why the study?
Near-infrared spectroscopy offers ecological advantages for measuring regions involved in emotion functions, but its capacity to detect activation during emotion processing needed evaluation.
Can NIRS detect neural activation during emotion processing in healthy individuals compared to a neutral condition or baseline?
Systematic Review
Can NIRS detect neural activation during emotion processing in healthy individuals compared to a neutral condition or baseline?
NIRS can detect prefrontal activation during emotional experience and regulation in healthy individuals, though standardization of methods is needed for consistent results in emotion perception.
Functional neuroimaging provides an avenue for earlier diagnosis and tailored treatment of psychological disorders characterised by emotional impairment. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) offers ecological advantages compared to other neuroimaging techniques and suitability of measuring regions involved in emotion functions. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the capacity of NIRS to detect activation during emotion processing and to provide recommendations for future research. Following a comprehensive literature search, we reviewed 85 journal articles, which compared activation during emotional experience, regulation or perception with either a neutral condition or baseline period among healthy participants. The quantitative synthesis of outcomes was limited to thematical analysis, owing to the lack of standardisation between studies. Although most studies found increased prefrontal activity during emotional experience and regulation, the findings were more inconsistent for emotion perception. Some researchers reported increased activity during the task, some reported decreases, some no significant changes, and some reported mixed findings depending on the valence and region. We propose that variations in the cognitive task and stimuli, recruited sample, and measurement and analysis of data are the primary causes of inconsistency. Recommendations to improve consistency in future research by carefully considering the choice of population, cognitive task and analysis approach are provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Westgarth et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Healthy individuals. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) vs. Neutral condition or baseline period was evaluated on Neural activation during emotional experience, regulation or perception. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) detected increased prefrontal activity during emotional experience and regulation in most studies, though findings for emotion perception were inconsistent.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: