Key result
A patient-centered VTE education bundle triggered by an EHR alert significantly reduced the odds of non-administration of VTE prophylaxis across all racial groups, including black (OR 0.61) and white (OR 0.57) patients.
Why the study?
Venous thromboembolism is a leading cause of preventable harm with observed disparities in prevention practices, and racial disparities remain common in healthcare.
Does a patient-centered VTE education bundle triggered by EHR alerts reduce the non-administration of VTE prophylaxis across different racial groups in hospitalized patients?
Observational (n=19,652)
No
Does a patient-centered VTE education bundle triggered by EHR alerts reduce the non-administration of VTE prophylaxis across different racial groups in hospitalized patients?
May improve equitable VTE prophylaxis adherence via EHR alerts; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Racial disparities are common in healthcare. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of preventable harm, and disparities observed in prevention practices. We examined the impact of a patient-centered VTE education bundle on the non-administration of preventive prophylaxis by race. METHODS: A post-hoc, subset analysis (stratified by race) of a larger nonrandomized trial. Pre-post comparisons analysis were conducted on 16 inpatient units; study periods were October 2014 through March 2015 (baseline) and April through December 2015 (post-intervention). Patients on 4 intervention units received the patient-centered, nurse educator-led intervention if the electronic health record alerted a non-administered dose of VTE prophylaxis. Patients on 12 control units received no intervention. We compared the conditional odds of non-administered doses of VTE prophylaxis when patient refusal was a reason for non-administration, stratified by race. RESULTS: Of 272 patient interventions, 123 (45.2%) were white, 126 (46.3%) were black, and 23 (8.5%) were other races. A significant reduction was observed in the odds of non-administration of prophylaxis on intervention units compared to control units among patients who were black (OR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46-0.81, p<0.001), white (OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44-0.75, p<0.001), and other races (OR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29-0.88, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Our finding suggests that the patient education materials, developed collaboratively with a diverse group of patients, improved patient's understanding and the importance of VTE prevention through prophylaxis. Quality improvement interventions should examine any differential effects by patient characteristics to ensure disparities are addressed and all patients experience the same benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Owodunni et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention (n=19,652). Patient-centered VTE education bundle and EHR alert vs. No intervention was evaluated on Non-administration of VTE prophylaxis (Black patients) (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.46-0.81, p=<0.001). A patient-centered VTE education bundle triggered by an EHR alert significantly reduced the odds of non-administration of VTE prophylaxis across all racial groups, including black (OR 0.61) and white (OR 0.57) patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: