Key result
Echocardiography demonstrated a moderate sensitivity of 78.7% for detecting acute myocardial infarction and 61.3% for chronic myocardial infarction when compared to cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Why the study?
Does transthoracic echocardiography accurately detect acute and chronic myocardial infarction compared to LGE-CMR in patients presenting with STEMI?
Observational (n=124)
Blinded to clinical and CMR data
No
Does transthoracic echocardiography accurately detect acute and chronic myocardial infarction compared to LGE-CMR in patients presenting with STEMI?
Echocardiography has only moderate sensitivity for detecting acute STEMI and even lower sensitivity for chronic MI, frequently missing smaller, less transmural, and non-anterior infarctions compared to LGE-CMR.
Echocardiography's moderate sensitivity warrants caution in relying on it alone for MI detection in STEMI; leaves open CMR's role in trials and select patients.
BACKGROUND: Although echocardiography is used as a first line imaging modality, its accuracy to detect acute and chronic myocardial infarction (MI) in relation to infarct characteristics as assessed with late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) is not well described. METHODS: One-hundred-forty-one echocardiograms performed in 88 first acute ST-elevation MI (STEMI) patients, 2 (IQR1-4) days (n = 61) and 102 (IQR92-112) days post-MI (n = 80), were pooled with echocardiograms of 36 healthy controls. 61 acute and 80 chronic echocardiograms were available for analysis (53 patients had both acute and chronic echocardiograms). Two experienced echocardiographers, blinded to clinical and CMR data, randomly evaluated all 177 echocardiograms for segmental wall motion abnormalities (SWMA). This was compared with LGE-CMR determined infarct characteristics, performed 104 ± 11 days post-MI. Enhancement on LGE-CMR matched the infarct-related artery territory in all patients (LAD 31%, LCx 12% and RCA 57%). RESULTS: The sensitivity of echocardiography to detect acute MI was 78.7% and 61.3% for chronic MI; specificity was 80.6%. Undetected MI were smaller, less transmural, and less extensive (6% [IQR3-12] vs. 15% [IQR9-24], 50 ± 14% vs. 61 ± 15%, 7 ± 3 vs. 9 ± 3 segments, p < 0.001 for all) and associated with higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and non-anterior location as compared to detected MI (58 ± 5% vs. 46 ± 7%, p < 0.001 and 82% vs. 63%, p = 0.03). After multivariate analysis, LVEF and infarct size were the strongest independent predictors of detecting chronic MI (OR 0.78 [95%CI 0.68-0.88], p < 0.001 and OR 1.22 [95%CI0.99-1.51], p = 0.06, respectively). Increasing infarct transmurality was associated with increasing SWMA (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting with STEMI, and thus a high likelihood of SWMA, the sensitivity of echocardiography to detect SWMA was higher in the acute than the chronic phase. Undetected MI were smaller, less extensive and less transmural, and associated with non-anterior localization and higher LVEF. Further work is needed to assess the diagnostic accuracy in patients with non-STEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaarsma et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Acute and chronic ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=124). Echocardiography vs. Late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) was evaluated on Sensitivity of echocardiography to detect acute myocardial infarction (95% CI 70.8-84.4). Echocardiography demonstrated a moderate sensitivity of 78.7% for detecting acute myocardial infarction and 61.3% for chronic myocardial infarction when compared to cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: