Why the study?
Does a hospital-based discharge medication program improve prescription rates and reduce postdischarge death or readmission in patients admitted to cardiovascular services?
Does a hospital-based discharge medication program improve prescription rates and reduce postdischarge death or readmission in patients admitted to cardiovascular services?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Implementation of a discharge medication program for cardiovascular patients significantly improved prescription rates of secondary prevention medications and was associated with reduced 1-year mortality and readmission.
BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease, a treatment gap for secondary prevention medications still exists. OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a program ensuring appropriate prescription of aspirin, statins, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and warfarin at hospital discharge. DESIGN: A nonrandomized before-after study comparing patients hospitalized before (1996-1998) and after (1999-2002) implementation of a discharge medication program (DMP). Patients were followed for up to 1 year. SETTING: The 10 largest hospitals in the Utah-based Intermountain Health Care system. PATIENTS: In the pre-DMP and DMP time periods, 26,000 and 31,465 patients, respectively, were admitted to cardiovascular services (n = 57,465). MEASUREMENTS: Prescription of indicated medications at hospital discharge; postdischarge death or readmission. RESULTS: By 1 year, the rate of prescription of each medication increased significantly to more than 90% (P < 0.001); this rate was sustained. At 1 year, unadjusted absolute event rates for readmission and death, respectively, were 210 per 1000 person-years and 96 per 1000 person-years before DMP implementation and 191 per 1000 person-years and 70 per 1000 person-years afterward. Relative risk for death and readmission at 30 days decreased after DMP implementation; hazard ratios (HRs) for death and readmission were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.89) and 0.92 (CI, 0.87 to 0.99) (P < 0.001 and P = 0.017, respectively). At 1 year, risk for death continued to decrease (hazard ratio, 0.79 [CI, 0.75 to 0.84]; P < 0.001) while risk for readmission stabilized (hazard ratio, 0.94 [CI, 0.90 to 0.98]; P = 0.002), probably because survivors had more opportunities to be readmitted. LIMITATIONS: The study design was observational and nonrandomized, and the authors could not control for potential confounders or determine the extent to which secular trends accounted for the observed improvements. CONCLUSIONS: A relatively simple quality improvement program aimed at enhancing the prescription of appropriate discharge medications among cardiovascular patients is feasible and can be sustained within an integrated multihospital system. Such a program may be associated with improvements in cardiovascular readmission rates and mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lappé et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: