Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
During the development of an automated cost estimating system, several factors led to the selection of the triangular probability-density function to model historical construction costs. The triangular-density function is customarily used when function parameters are directly estimated by experts. A typical example is for estimating activity durations by identifying a minimum value, a most likely value, and a maximum value. These values are then used to construct triangular-density functions to represent uncertain activity durations. For this work, however, it was necessary to estimate parameters of the triangular-density function using historical cost data. A methodology was developed to generate test data and compare three methods of parameter estimation—maximum likelihood, moment matching, and least-squares curve-fitting techniques. It is concluded that optimized moment matching and least-squares techniques produce more accurate parameter estimates, while maximum likelihood estimation yields less accurate results. It is further concluded that the least-squares minimization method always performed as well as or better than the optimized moment matching technique and was therefore selected as the method of choice for the project.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Back et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: