Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To determine surface roughness caused by Er:YAG laser irradiation and its effect on the increase in bacterial adhesion. Background: Er:YAG laser was proposed as a strategic device to reduce caries by its ability to generate chemical and structural changes in tooth enamel; in turn, it produces undesirable effects on the tooth surface that could increase its roughness and allow a greater accumulation of microorganisms. Methods: Eighty-four samples of human enamel were divided into seven groups ( n = 12): G1_control (no laser irradiation); G2_100/H 2 O, G3_200/H 2 O, and G4_300/H 2 O were irradiated with Er:YAG laser (12.7, 25.5, and 38.2 J/cm 2 , respectively) under water irrigation. In addition, G5_100, G6_200, and G7_300 were irradiated with the energy densities described above and no water irrigation. Surface roughness measurements were recorded before and after treatment using a profilometer. Afterward, three samples per group were incubated in a microorganism suspension for the tetrazolium salt (XTT) assay. Biofilm morphology was observed using scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscope. One-way analysis of variance and t -tests were performed for statistical analysis ( p < 0.05). Results: There were no statistically significant differences in roughness values in the G5_100 group before and after treatment, but there were statistically significant differences observed in the other groups evaluated ( p < 0.05). No significant differences in adhesion of both strains were detected in irradiated groups compared with G1_control. Conclusions: The increase in roughness on dental enamel surfaces was proportional to the irradiation conditions. However, the increase in surface roughness caused by Er:YAG laser irradiation did not affect Streptococcus mutans and S. sanguinis adhesion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teutle‐Coyotecatl et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: