Why the study?
Assessing the magnitude of pulmonary hypertension is critical for intra-operative management in children and infants with an isolated VSD.
Does transesophageal echocardiography accurately estimate pulmonary arterial systolic pressure compared to invasive measurement in children undergoing surgery for isolated VSD?
Does transesophageal echocardiography accurately estimate pulmonary arterial systolic pressure compared to invasive measurement in children undergoing surgery for isolated VSD?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Transesophageal echocardiography is recommended as a screening and monitoring tool for pulmonary hypertension in children with isolated VSDs under general anesthesia, but its limits of agreement preclude its use as a definitive diagnostic tool.
BACKGROUND: The magnitude of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is extremely important with respect to the intra-operative management of children and infants with an isolated ventricular septal defect (VSD). This study aimed to assess the feasibility and accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography for estimating pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) across isolated VSD. METHODS: We compared the results of transesophageal echocardiography vs invasive PASP measured simultaneously. This study included 40 patients (age: 6 months to 6 years; weight: >5 kg) who were undergoing elective surgery for isolated VSDs. Flow signals across the VSDs were identified as high velocity turbulent signals in systole via continuous wave Doppler at 0-120° at the mid-esophageal level. Peak velocities were recorded. Radial artery systolic pressures were assessed invasively, and PASPs were obtained after exposing the pulmonary artery intra-operatively. RESULTS: After excluding five patients because of unusable measurements, invasive PASP measurements were obtained in 35 patients (87.5%). There were no significant biases between echocardiographic and catheterization measurements of PASP, with a tight confidence interval measuring, on average, up to 2.6 mmHg. However, the ± 2 standard deviation limits of agreement for mean PASP were -3.8 and 10.6 mmHg. CONCLUSION: PASP measurements via transesophageal echocardiography in cardiac surgical patients under general anesthesia are recommended for use as a screening and monitoring tool for PH in children and infants, but cannot be used as a diagnostic tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: