Key result
An algorithm was proposed for the intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of pulmonary hypertension in patients suspected of having raised pulmonary pressure.
The paper proposes a structured algorithm for intraoperative TEE evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension during cardiac surgery.
Offers structured TEE algorithm for intraoperative PH assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) >25 mm Hg at rest is confirmed by right heart catheterization (RHC). With the rapid development of surgical methods and cardiopulmonary bypass strategies, many children and adults are undergoing surgical correction for their cardiac pathologies. Presence of PH in these patients contributes to a major morbidity and poses a great challenge for the operative team during its surgical and postoperative management. With the universal use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in almost all cardiac surgeries, the etiology, severity of PH, and its effect on cardiac structures and function can be evaluated in patients suspected of having PH. Since there is no established algorithm for the intraoperative TEE evaluation of such patients, we proposed an algorithm for the evaluation of PH in patients suspected of having raised pulmonary pressure using TEE in the intraoperative period. How to cite this article Kumar MG, Puri GD. Transesophageal Echocardiographic Approach to a Patient with Suspected Pulmonary Hypertension in the Intraoperative Period. J Perioper Echocardiogr 2017;5(2):49-63.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2017) conducted a review in Pulmonary Hypertension. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) algorithm was evaluated. An algorithm was proposed for the intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of pulmonary hypertension in patients suspected of having raised pulmonary pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: