A duplicated TATAAAA sequence in the myoglobin gene of the Antarctic icefish Chaenocephalus aceratus interferes with transcription, explaining the loss of cardiac myoglobin expression in this species.
Offers no immediate clinical implications; leaves open whether analogous promoter defects regulate cardiac myoglobin in other vertebrates.
Six of the 16 known species of Antarctic icefish (family Channichthyidae) have lost the ability to express cardiac myoglobin (Mb) via at least four independent events during radiation of these species. We report here that the lesion in Chaenocephalus aceratus Mb is a duplicated TATAAAA element that blocks transcription. This lesion is distinct from those of other icefish species that do not express cardiac Mb. The C. aceratus Mb gene is nearly identical to that of Chionodraco rastrospinosus, a closely related Mb-expressing icefish species, with one exception. A 15-bp segment is present in C. aceratus but absent from C. rastrospinosus; this insertion is located 648 bp upstream from the reference transcription start site of C. rastrospinosus and includes the sequence TATAAAA, which bound HeLa cell transcription factor IID (TFIID) and icefish nuclear proteins in gel-retardation assays. Reporter constructs containing the 'full-length' C. aceratus Mb promoter were not expressed in transient expression assays in oxidative skeletal muscle of live icefish. By contrast, constructs employing the nearly identical 'full-length' C. rastrospinosus Mb promoter were efficiently expressed in parallel assays in the same tissue. Truncated constructs of C. aceratus Mb that did not contain the 15-bp duplication were expressed at very low levels. These data confirm a third independent mechanism of Mb loss among channichthyid species, indicate that C. aceratus aerobic muscle is capable of expressing functional Mb genes and demonstrate that duplication of the muscle-specific TATAAAA sequence in an inappropriate context can result in loss of a gene's expression, resulting in significant physiological consequences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Small et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: