PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 17, 2017Acta Neurologica Scandinavica15 citations

Visual field defect after ischemic stroke-impact on mortality

View Full Paper
KSKristin Modalsli SandSørlandet SykehusHNHalvor NæssStavanger University HospitalLTLars ThomassenHaukeland University Hospital

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the impact of visual field defects (VFD) on mortality in ischemic stroke patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with acute infarction and a clinically detected VFD from February 2006 to December 2013 in the NORSTROKE Registry (n = 506) were included and compared with ischemic stroke patients with normal visual fields (n = 2041). A record of patients who had died per ultimo April 2015 was obtained from the central registry at Haukeland University Hospital. RESULTS: Patients with VFD were significantly older (75.0 vs 69.8, P < .001) than patients with normal visual fields. The majority of patients with VFD was male, had higher cardiovascular morbidity prestroke, and were more likely to have shorter median time from symptom onset to admission (1.7 hours vs 2.7 hours, P < .001). Baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was higher (12.7 vs 3.5, P < .001) as was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (3.5 vs 1.9, P < .001) and Barthel Index was lower (51.9 vs 84.8, P < .001) day 7. VFD was associated with increased mortality on Kaplan-Meier plots. Hazard ratio was significantly higher for patients with VFD after adjusting for age, sex, employment prior to infarction, married prior to infarction, institutionalization prior to infarction, prior myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, smoking, Barthel Index score and i.v. thrombolysis with Cox regression (hazard ratios HR 1.30, CI 1.07-1.56, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Having a visual field defect after ischemic stroke is independently associated with increased mortality. This should be addressed when selecting candidates for thrombolysis and in the rehabilitation process.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sand et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a196c13fa25ab5db6d97bf7https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12870
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Predicting Long-Term Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke2008 · 258 citations
  2. 2Age-Related Eye Disease and Survival1995 · 172 citations
  3. 3Interventions for Visual Field Defects in Patients With Stroke2012 · 53 citations
  4. 4Recovery of Visual Fields in Acute Stroke: Homonymous Hemianopia Associated with Adverse Prognosis1989 · 129 citations
  5. 5Effectiveness of testing visual fields by confrontation2001 · 71 citations