Advances in next-generation sequencing have expanded the genetic landscape of inherited cardiomyopathies, improving diagnostic yields and highlighting the role of genes like TTN and RPL3L.
May refine genetic testing panels in cardiomyopathy; leaves open functional validation and clinical utility of most genes.
Cardiomyopathies (CMs) are a clinically heterogeneous group of cardiovascular diseases characterized by structural and functional abnormalities of the heart muscle in the absence of coronary artery disease, hypertension, valve disease, or congenital heart disease as a leading cause. The phenotypic spectrum of CMs ranges from silent heart failure to symptomatic heart failure and sudden cardiac death, and CMs are one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbidity worldwide. CMs are highly heritable, although a clear distinction between inherited and acquired forms remains challenging, particularly due to observed incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity of inherited CMs. Based on their specific morphological phenotypes and functional characteristics, CMs can be divided into at least 5 different subgroups: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM), restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM), and (left ventricular) non-compaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC), which show both clinical as well as genetic overlap. Since the identification of pathogenic variants in MYH7 as a genetic cause of HCM in 1990, enormous progress has been made in understanding genetic factors contributing to cardiomyopathies. Currently, over 100 genes have been associated with at least one of the CM subtypes, providing a deeper understanding of the cellular basis of genetic heart failure syndromes, unveiling new insights into the molecular biology of heart function in both health and disease, and, thereby, facilitating the development of novel therapeutic strategies and personalized treatment approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yigit et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: