Why the study?
Revascularization strategies for STEMI and multi-vessel disease depend on cardiogenic shock status, but assessing shock acutely is difficult.
Does complete revascularization improve mortality compared to culprit-only PCI in patients with STEMI, multi-vessel disease, and shock defined by lactate ≥2 mmol/L?
Does complete revascularization improve mortality compared to culprit-only PCI in patients with STEMI, multi-vessel disease, and shock defined by lactate ≥2 mmol/L?
In patients with STEMI, multi-vessel disease, and early cardiogenic shock defined by lactate ≥2 mmol/L, complete revascularization during the index procedure is associated with significantly higher mortality than culprit-only PCI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support culprit-only PCI in this shock subset; leaves open confirmation by randomized trials.
AIMS: Revascularization strategy for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multi-vessel disease varies according to the patient's cardiogenic shock status, but assessing shock acutely can be difficult. This article examines the link between cardiogenic shock defined solely by a lactate of ≥2 mmol/L and mortality from complete vs. culprit-only revascularization in this cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients presenting with STEMI, multi-vessel disease without severe left main stem stenosis and a lactate ≥2 mmol/L between 2011 and 2021 were included. The primary endpoint was mortality at 30 days by revascularization strategy for shocked patients. Secondary endpoints were mortality at 1 year and over a median follow-up of 30 months. Four hundred and eight patients presented in shock. Mortality in the shock cohort was 27.5% at 30 days. Complete revascularization (CR) was associated with higher mortality at 30 days [odds ratio (OR) 2.1 (1.02-4.2), P = 0.043], 1 year [OR 2.4 (1.2-4.9), P = 0.01], and over 30 months follow-up [hazard ratio (HR) 2.2 (1.4-3.4), P < 0.001] compared with culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (CLOP). Mortality was again higher in the CR group after propensity matching (P = 0.018) and inverse probability treatment weighting [HR 2.0 (1.3-3.0), P = 0.001]. Furthermore, explainable machine learning demonstrated that CR was behind only blood gas parameters and creatinine levels in importance for predicting 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: In patients presenting with STEMI and multi-vessel disease in shock defined solely by a lactate of ≥2 mmol/L, CR is associated with higher mortality than CLOP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tindale et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: