Why the study?
It remains controversial whether altered hemorheological parameters can serve as markers of stenosis or generalized atherosclerosis in patients with carotid artery stenosis.
Does whole blood viscosity differ between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with severe extracranial carotid artery stenosis?
Does whole blood viscosity differ between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with severe extracranial carotid artery stenosis?
Whole blood viscosity parameters (LSR and HSR) do not significantly differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis.
Whole blood viscosity does not differentiate symptomatic status in carotid stenosis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before any clinical use.
Objective: Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is not only an important risk factor for cerebrovascular events but also can indicate generalized atherosclerosis.Hemorheological parameters are altered in CAS and chronic cerebrovascular disorders as well, but it is controversial whether hemorheological parameters could be markers of stenosis or atherosclerosis. Materials and Methods:We studied 154 patients with extracranial internal carotid artery stenting for symptomatic or asymptomatic severe CAS.Hematocrit total protein values of the patients included in the study were calculated using the De-Simone constant formula, low shear stress (LSR) and high shear stress (HSR). Results:No statistically significant difference was found between the whole blood viscosities (LSR, HSR) of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with carotid artery stenting (p=0.234,p=0.165). Conclusion:Although hemorheological parameters are impaired in both CAS and chronic cerebrovascular disorders, the severity of stenosis cannot be detected based on hemorheological parameters.Our investigation suggests that the alteration of hemorheological parameters could indicate carotid atherosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bilgiç et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: