Why the study?
Methodological differences between Western and Japanese acetylcholine protocols may lead to the opposite reported prevalence of coronary vasomotor disorders.
What is the optimal intracoronary acetylcholine testing protocol for diagnosing coronary endothelial dysfunction and epicardial/microvascular spasm?
What is the optimal intracoronary acetylcholine testing protocol for diagnosing coronary endothelial dysfunction and epicardial/microvascular spasm?
Standardization of intracoronary acetylcholine testing protocols is needed globally, as injection duration significantly alters the provocation of coronary epicardial versus microvascular spasm.
Standardization of acetylcholine testing protocols is warranted; leaves open whether prevalence differences reflect biology or methodology.
Intracoronary acetylcholine (ACH) testing is clinically useful to diagnose the presence of the coronary vasomotor disorders coronary endothelial dysfunction and coronary epicardial/microvascular spasm. In Western countries, continuous intracoronary injection of ACH for 2-3 minutes without a pacemaker is the usual method, while rapid injection of ACH for 20-30 seconds with a pacemaker is the traditional procedure in Japan. Coronary microvascular spasm is often observed in Western populations, whereas coronary epicardial spasm is frequently seen in Japanese subjects. Methodological differences between Western and Japanese protocols may lead to the opposite prevalence of coronary vasomotor disorders. This article discusses the optimal method for diagnosing endothelial dysfunction and epicardial/microvascular spasm based on previous reports, and compares intracoronary ACH testing performed by Western cardiologists with that by Japanese physicians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sueda et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: