Why the study?
Is intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing useful for the assessment of coronary vasomotor disorders in patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries?
Is intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing useful for the assessment of coronary vasomotor disorders in patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries?
Intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing is a valuable diagnostic tool in the catheterization laboratory for identifying coronary vasomotor disorders in patients with angina and unobstructed coronary arteries.
May support acetylcholine testing in stable angina with unobstructed arteries; leaves open randomized outcome trials.
Intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing (ACH-test) is an established method for assessment of epicardial coronary artery spasm in the catheterization laboratory which was introduced more than 30 years ago. Due to the short half-life of acetylcholine it can only be applied directly into the coronary arteries. Several studies have demonstrated the safety and clinical usefulness of this test. However, acetylcholine testing is only rarely applied in the U.S. or Europe. Nevertheless, it has been shown that 62% of Caucasian patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries on coronary angiography suffer from coronary vasomotor disorders that can be diagnosed with acetylcholine testing. In recent years it has been appreciated that the ACH-test not only assesses the presence of epicardial spasm but that it can also be useful for the detection of coronary microvascular spam. In such cases no epicardial spasm is seen after injection of acetylcholine but ischemic ECG shifts are present together with a reproduction of the patient's symptoms during the test. This article describes the experience with the ACH-test and its implementation in daily clinical routine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Athanasiadis et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: