Key result
Acetylcholine spasm provocation testing proves safe, with ~1% major complications using modified dosing.
Why the study?
Is the intracoronary acetylcholine spasm provocation test safe and effective for diagnosing coronary spastic angina in real-world clinical practice?
Is the intracoronary acetylcholine spasm provocation test safe and effective for diagnosing coronary spastic angina in real-world clinical practice?
This 24-year review demonstrates that the acetylcholine spasm provocation test is safe and supports using higher maximal doses than current guidelines to improve diagnostic sensitivity for coronary spastic angina.
Supports safety of acetylcholine spasm testing in experienced centers; leaves open whether higher doses improve yield without added risk.
The acetylcholine (ACh) spasm provocation test proposed by Yasue, Okumura et al more than a quarter-century ago has become a popular method for induction of coronary spasm. This test is safe and has a low rate of complications. However, it may be limited in its ability to document attacks in daily life because previously it was the gold-standard method for diagnosing active variant angina. There may be some clinical issues to modify for the next generation of cardiologists. A maximal ACh dose of 50/100 µg in the right coronary artery/left coronary artery is recommended in the Japanese Circulation Society guidelines. We often experienced the usefulness of a maximal ACh dose of 80/200 µg for the induction of coronary spasm in some cases with low or moderate disease activity. It may be necessary to reconsider the maximal ACh dose as a modified method for today's real-world clinical practice. In young patients with rest angina, intracoronary injection of ACh is less sensitive for diagnosis; in these cases, we recommend performing sequential spasm provocation tests. Especially in female patients, to document coronary artery spasm we recommend performing ACh tests first, instead of ergonovine tests, due to the supersensitivity of ACh. We also recommend supplementary use of ACh and ergonovine. This review summarizes our experiences with the ACh spasm provocation test over a period of 24 years. We have found it to be a reliable and useful method for contributing a variety of clinical information and recommend it to the next generation of cardiologists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sueda et al. (2015) conducted a review in Suspected coronary spastic angina (n=1,546). Acetylcholine spasm provocation test was evaluated on Induction of coronary artery spasm and safety of the procedure. The acetylcholine spasm provocation test is safe (0.9% serious major complications) and clinically useful, with authors recommending a modified maximal dose of 80/200 µg (RCA/LCA) to reduce false negatives.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: