Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
I argue that ecological data analyses are often needlessly complicated, and I present two examples of published analyses for which simpler alternatives are available. Unnecessary complexity is often introduced when analysts focus on subunits of the key experimental or observational units in a study, or use a very general framework to present an analysis that is a simple special case. Simpler analyses are easier to explain and understand; they clarify what the key units in a study are; they reduce the chances for computational mistakes; and they are more likely to lead to the same conclusions when applied by different analysts to the same data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul A. Murtaugh (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: