Why the study?
Accurate determination of risk for blood pressure elevation and hypertension with patient-applied testosterone replacement therapies is complicated by office measurement limitations and suboptimal ambulatory blood pressure monitoring methods.
Does patient-applied testosterone replacement therapy pose risk for blood pressure elevation?
Does patient-applied testosterone replacement therapy pose risk for blood pressure elevation?
Accurate determination of blood pressure elevation risk from patient-applied testosterone replacement therapies is hindered by suboptimal blood pressure monitoring methods in safety trials.
Limitations of office BP and suboptimal ABPM in TRT trials hinder accurate risk assessment; leaves open whether patient-applied therapies elevate BP.
We reviewed medication package inserts, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports, and journal publications concerning the 10 nonbiosimilar patient-applied (PA) testosterone (T) replacement therapies (TRTs) for intraday serum T patterning and blood pressure (BP) effects. Blood T concentration is circadian rhythmic in young adult eugonadal males, being highest around awakening and lowest before bedtime. T level and 24 h variation are blunted in primary and secondary hypogonadism. Utilized as recommended, most PA-TRTs achieve nonphysiologic T 24 h patterning. Only Androderm®, an evening PA transdermal patch, closely replicates the normal T circadian rhythmicity. Accurate determination of risk for BP elevation and hypertension (HTN) by PA-TRTs is difficult due to limitations of office BP measurements (OBPM) and suboptimal methods and endpoints of ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). OBPM is subject to “White Coat” pressor effect resulting in unrepresentative BP values plus masked normotension and masked HTN, causing misclassification of approximately 45% of trial participants, both before and during treatment. Change in guideline-recommended diagnostic thresholds over time causes misclassification of an additional approximately 15% of participants. ABPM is improperly incorporated into TRT safety trials. It is done for 24 h rather than preferred 48 h; BP is oversampled during wakefulness, biasing derived 24 h mean values; 24 h mean systolic and diastolic BP (SBP, DBP) are inappropriate primary outcomes, because of not being best predictors of risk for major acute cardiovascular events (MACE); “daytime” and “nighttime” BP means referenced to clock time are reported rather than biologically relevant wake-time and sleep-time BP means; most importantly, asleep SBP mean and dipping, strongest predictors of MACE, are disregarded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smolensky et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: