High-intensity interval training (HIT) is characterized by intermittent periods of work and rest and may include work bouts lasting seconds to minutes. HIT has typically been applied to older, diseased, and at-risk populations using longer work intervals (2-4 minutes), whereas more recent definitions of HIT include work intervals of 30 to 60 s. Both traditional endurance training (TET) and HIT exert a peripheral affect increasing the capacity of muscle cells to oxidize substrate via signaling cascades that support the activation of transcription factors that orchestrate the coexpression of nuclear and mitochondrial genes, with HIT triggering these benefits following minutes of training. With 1 exception, reports of central adaptations (eg, increased stroke volume) have been based on longer work intervals (eg, 4 minutes). Recent investigations have tied HIT to increased lipolysis and enhanced insulin sensitivity. HIT favors the activation of oxidative as opposed to hypertrophic pathways. Although the length of the work interval may need to be adjusted to fit the needs and capacity of the participant, HIT should be considered as an alternative to TET for older adults with the expectation that it requires less time to execute, yet promotes peripheral and perhaps central adaptations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Whitehurst (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: