Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two results on interactive proof systems with two-way probabilistic finite-state verifiers are proved. The first is a lower bound on the power of such proof systems if they are not required to halt with high probability on rejected inputs: it is shown that they can accept any recursively enumerable language. The second is an upper bound on the power of interactive proof systems that halt with high probability on all inputs. The proof method for the lower bound also shows that the emptiness problem for one-way probabilistic finite-state machines is undecidable. In the proof of the upper bound some results of independent interest on the rate of convergence of time-varying Markov chains to their halting states are obtained.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Condon et al. (1989) studied this question.