Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper argues that, despite the obvious and important differences between high-stakes and low-stakes assessment, there remain important points in common. These manifest themselves at a sociological level, where each tradition of assessment shares a similar disposition towards power. It is argued that both high-stakes and low-stakes assessment, as they are practised in England today, act together in support of a wider regime of power. This regime relies upon the construction of specialised subjectivities, defined by a myopic and self-perpetuating concern with individual progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ansgar Allen (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: