Why the study?
Do ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists reduce renal damage in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria?
Do ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists reduce renal damage in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria?
This review highlights the lack of consensus on initiating renoprotective therapy with ACE inhibitors or ARBs in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria.
Lack of consensus on ACE inhibitor initiation timing persists in pediatric type 1 diabetes microalbuminuria; leaves open optimal renoprotective strategies for randomized trials.
Nephropathy is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes and, in adults, persistent microalbuminuria is the best marker of the consequent risk for its development. In the pediatric population, puberty represents the most important risk factor for the development of microangiopathic complications, although it is not necessarily associated with the progression to frank proteinuria. As many as 50% of subjects may revert to normoalbuminuria. Hypertension is a further risk factor and may accelerate the progression of micro- and macrovascular complications. There is evidence that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce renal damage by one or more mechanisms independent of their antihypertensive effects--hence they represent the drug of choice for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. However, as angiotensin II receptor antagonists are more specific, they may become the obvious treatment choice in the near future. There is no consensus as to who should be treated and when treatment with renoprotective drugs should begin in the pediatric population, due to the lack of a clear definition of the natural history of microalbuminuria in this age group. In this review some models and controversial aspects of this issue are presented and discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiarelli et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: