Why the study?
Does a low-intensity continuous quality improvement intervention improve the adoption of coronary artery bypass grafting process-of-care measures at National Cardiac Database sites?
Does a low-intensity continuous quality improvement intervention improve the adoption of coronary artery bypass grafting process-of-care measures at National Cardiac Database sites?
A multifaceted, physician-led, low-intensity continuous quality improvement effort can significantly increase the adoption of evidence-based care processes into national practice.
Supports low-intensity CQI to improve CABG process measures; extends evidence for targeted quality interventions at lower-volume sites.
A rigorous evaluation of the effects of continuous quality improvement (CQI) on medical practice has not yet been achieved on a large, multicenter scale. The authors sought to test whether a low-intensity CQI intervention could be used to speed the adoption of two coronary artery bypass grafting process-of-care measures on a national level. The infrastructure of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' National Cardiac Database was used as a CQI Platform in a prospective randomized trial of CQI conducted between January 2001 and July 2002. Preoperative beta-blockade and internal mammary artery grafting in patients aged >75 years were the care processes used. Three hundred fifty-nine National Cardiac Database sites were randomized into two intervention groups (beta blocker, n=124; internal mammary artery grafting, n=114) and one control group (n=114). Each intervention arm received measure-specific information, including a call to action to a physician leader; educational products; and periodic longitudinal, nationally benchmarked, site-specific feedback. Incorporation of the specific care process into everyday clinical practice at the intervention site was the main outcome measure. The analyses included a site-level analysis of differences between pre- and postintervention measure use and a hierarchical analysis using risk-adjustment for patient characteristics and accounting for clustering due to site. Use of beta blockers increased vs. control (Delta=7% vs. Delta=4%), significant at both the site level (p=0.04) and in the hierarchical analyses (p=0.0006). Internal mammary artery graft use also increased vs. control (Delta=9% vs. Delta=5%; p=0.20 and p=0.11, respectively). However, lower volume IMA sites showed significant improvement over lower volume control sites (Delta=14% vs. Delta=8%; p=0.02 for interaction). A multifaceted, physician-led, low-intensity effort can have an impact on the adoption of care processes into national practice. This Society CQI Platform is a potential model for large-scale quality improvement efforts across all disciplines of medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T. Bruce Ferguson (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: