Why the study?
Intensive care unit length of stay is significant for evaluating the effect of inpatient cardiac surgical treatment, motivating accurate prediction models.
Does a gradient boosted decision tree model accurately predict ICU length of stay in patients with cardiac surgery?
Does a gradient boosted decision tree model accurately predict ICU length of stay in patients with cardiac surgery?
A gradient boosted decision tree model using 44 predictors achieved a mean accuracy of 0.687 for predicting ICU length of stay in cardiac surgery patients, facilitating early intervention.
May aid ICU planning after cardiac surgery; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND The intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay is significant to evaluate the effect of cardiac surgical treatment inpatient. OBJECTIVE This research aims to accurately predict the ICU length of stay in patients with cardiac surgery. Methods: We used machine learning methods to construct the model, and the medical information mart for intensive care (MIMIC IV) database was used as the data source. A total of 7,567 patients were enrolled and the mean length of stay in the ICU was 3.12 days. A total of 126 predictors were included, and 44 important predictors were screened by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression. METHODS We used machine learning methods to construct the model, and the medical information mart for intensive care (MIMIC IV) database was used as the data source. A total of 7,567 patients were enrolled and the mean length of stay in the ICU was 3.12 days. A total of 126 predictors were included, and 44 important predictors were screened by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression. RESULTS The mean accuracy are 0.603 (95% confidence interval (CI): [0.602-0.604]), 0.687 (95% confidence interval (CI): [0.687-0.688]) and 0.688 (95% confidence interval (CI): [0.687-0.689]) for the logistic regression (LR) with all variables, the gradient boosted decision tree (GBDT) with important variables and the GBDT with all variables respectively. CONCLUSIONS The GBDT model with important predictors partly overestimated patients whose length of stay was less than 3 days and underestimated patients whose length of stay was longer than 3 days. But the better prediction performance of GBDT facilitates early intervention of ICU patients with a long period of hospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: