Online experiment demonstrates that perceived relevance mediates ad personalization benefits while intrusiveness reduces brand attitude in Facebook users, highlighting boundaries of targeted ads.
Advertisers increasingly use personal information in social media advertisements as a strategy to promote positive brand attitudes. Personalized ads can be perceived as both positive and negative. This two-sided effect of personalization refers to the personalization paradox. An online experiment (N 209), in which the level of personalization was manipulated in a Facebook setting, aimed to provide a potential explanation for this paradox. The findings showed that a highly personalized ad resulted in stronger perceived personalization than a less personalized ad. Furthermore, the stronger the perceived personalization, the stronger the relevance. The relevance of the ad positively influenced brand attitude and fully mediated the relationship between personalization and attitude. However, in line with the assumptions of the information boundary theory, the more the ad was perceived as intrusive, the weaker the relevance-attitude relationship, thereby showing a boundary condition for the effectiveness of personalized information when targeting consumers on Facebook.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Judith I. M. de Groot (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: