Why the study?
Mitral interventions are technically challenging due to anatomical complexity and heterogeneity, and deriving spatial understanding from 2D projections creates an imaging gap that limits pre-procedural planning.
3D printing has the potential to bridge the imaging gap in structural heart interventions by facilitating patient-specific modeling and procedural planning for complex mitral valve interventions.
May guide planning in select mitral cases; leaves open prospective validation before adoption.
Mitral interventions remain technically challenging owing to the anatomical complexity and heterogeneity of mitral pathologies. As such, multi-disciplinary pre-procedural planning assisted by advanced cardiac imaging is pivotal to successful outcomes. Modern imaging techniques offer accurate 3D renderings of cardiac anatomy; however, users are required to derive a spatial understanding of complex mitral pathologies from a 2D projection thus generating an 'imaging gap' which limits procedural planning. Physical mitral modelling using 3D printing has the potential to bridge this gap and is increasingly being employed in conjunction with other transformative technologies to assess feasibility of intervention, direct prosthesis choice and avoid complications. Such platforms have also shown value in training and patient education. Despite important limitations, the pace of innovation and synergistic integration with other technologies is likely to ensure that 3D printing assumes a central role in the journey towards delivering personalised care for patients undergoing mitral valve interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bharucha et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: