Why the study?
Does the WT-HR tachometer accurately measure heart rate and correlate with physiological parameters in healthy university students?
Does the WT-HR tachometer accurately measure heart rate and correlate with physiological parameters in healthy university students?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A newly developed wristwatch-type heart rate recorder accurately measures heart rate and correlates with physiological parameters, suggesting utility for assessing daily mental and physical activity.
We have developed a wristwatch-type heart rate (HR) recorder (WT-HR tachometer) with an acceleration-pickup sensor, which can record HR and body activity (ACT) minute by minute for a long time (> 120 h). To study its application, we compared these measurements with 24-h blood pressure (BP) and HR variability, sympathovagal balance, and resting energy expenditure (REE). The WT-HR tachometer incorporates a Seiko-blue sensor to measure HR at the wrist and an acceleration-pickup sensor to measure body ACT every 4 sec. Fifty healthy university students underwent measurement of HR and ACT by the WT-HR tachometer for 24 h. Then we calculated the minimum HR and mean HR during waking time and derived deltaHR. On the same day, 24-hr BP and LF/HF (low frequency component/high frequency component of ECG-RR interval power spectrum) were measured with a multibiomedical recorder, and REE was measured with a portable calorimeter. The WT-HR tachometer accurately measured HR, compared with the measurements by Holter-ECG. There was a significant correlation between deltaHR and deltaSBP. There also was a significant correlation between deltaHR and deltaLF/HF, (waking time = waking time without body movement) and a significant correlation between HR and REE. These results suggest that ACT and deltaHR are useful for evaluating mental and physical activity of daily life. The WH-HR tachometer will be useful for assessment of mental and physical activity in daily life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sawai et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: