Why the study?
Data are limited on the superiority of specific anti-anginal regimens and how these medications affect outcomes of elective PCI in patients with SIHD.
Does nitrate treatment increase all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing non-emergent PCI?
Does nitrate treatment increase all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing non-emergent PCI?
In patients undergoing elective PCI, pre-procedural nitrate therapy is associated with increased in-hospital mortality, likely serving as a marker for advanced disease burden and multiple comorbidities.
Background Notwithstanding the guideline endorsement of various anti-anginal medications, there is a paucity of data on whether one anti-anginal regimen or medication is superior to another. It is also unknown how anti-anginal medications affect outcomes of elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). To fill this knowledge gap, we investigated an association between commonly used anti-anginal medications and elective PCI outcomes in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) patients. Methods Using the New York State's (NYS) PCI Reporting System, we reviewed data on 33,568 consecutive patients who underwent non-emergent PCI in 2015. The primary endpoint of this study was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Results Regardless of the combination therapy of nitrates with any other non-nitrate anti-anginal therapy, including beta-adrenergic blockers (BB) and/or calcium channel blockers (CCB), nitrate treatment continued to be associated with significantly increased post-elective PCI mortality. Conclusions In this large, all-inclusive state-wide contemporary cohort study of SIHD patients, treatment with nitrates, but not beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or ranolazine, was associated with increased post-PCI mortality. Utilization of nitrate therapy is likely reflective of advanced disease burden rather than directly related to the specific medication intolerance. Additional studies investigating optimal anti-anginal medical therapy on PCI outcomes are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yager et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: