Why the study?
Gastroesophageal reflux occurs in RFCA due to vagal plexus damage, and researchers hypothesized that reflux frequency in the oropharynx would be lower than in the mid- and low-esophagus.
Does the use of a supraglottic device during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation under general anesthesia lead to gastroesophageal reflux?
Does the use of a supraglottic device during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation under general anesthesia lead to gastroesophageal reflux?
The use of a supraglottic device during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation under general anesthesia is associated with a 43% incidence of gastroesophageal reflux, primarily in the lower esophagus, but without clinical aspiration pneumonia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supraglottic device use during AF ablation may warrant reflux monitoring despite no aspiration; observational data leaves open causal risks and practice implications.
Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) occurs due to vagal plexus damage during pulmonary vein isolation. We hypothesized that the frequency of GER in the oropharynx will be less compared to other areas (low-esophagus, mid-esophagus). We confirmed the frequency of GER before and after RFCA in 3 areas.We studied 30 patients who were scheduled for RFCA under general anesthesia. Anesthesia was performed using supraglottic devices (SGD) with a suction port. Two esophageal temperature probes capable of suction and measuring temperature were inserted through the suction port. The pH of the 3 areas was measured before and after the RFCA at 3 areas (mid-esophagus, low-esophagus, and oropharynx).GER was observed in 13 of 30 patients (43%). In one patient, it was observed in the oropharynx, in 4 patients it was observed in the mid-esophagus, and in 13 patients, it was observed in the low-esophagus. For patients with GER at the oropharynx and mid-esophagus, it was also observed at the low-esophagus. The difference in the pH before and after the RFCA was not significant at the oropharynx and mid-esophagus (P = .726 and P = .424, respectively), but it was significantly different at the low-esophagus (P < .001). The total ablation time was longer in the GER group compared to the non-GER group (P = .021).GER after RFCA occurred in 43% of patients, only 1 patient in the oropharynx. And aspiration pneumonia after SGD extubation did not occur. Therefore, the use of SGDs in RFCA does not completely eliminate the possibility of aspiration, so care should be taken.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahn et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: