PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 14, 2026Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

Participant-reported chest pain and gastric esophageal reflux disease following protective esophageal cooling during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation – the EVERCOOL-AF study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Active esophageal cooling reduces thermal injury risk during AF ablation but may not reduce GERD symptoms, and factors associated with post-ablation GERD and chest pain despite cooling remain unclear.

Population

295 participants undergoing RFA with esophageal cooling for paroxysmal or persistent AF

Comparison

Participants with vs without post-ablation GERD and chest pain

Design

Observational questionnaire-based study

Follow-up

7–14 days post-procedure

Key result

Among patients undergoing AF ablation with esophageal cooling, post-ablation chest pain occurred in 24.1% and was less common when bilateral first-pass isolation was achieved (59.2% vs 72.6%, p=0.033).

Authors

JSJoshua R. SilversteinGSGeorge ShawHPHuy M. Phan

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Key expert perspectives

Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.

DJDr. Jose Osorioelectrophysiologist

“This evaluation will help us confirm the benefits of oesophageal cooling beyond safety alone, including shorter procedure times, reduced fluoroscopy requirements, greater hospital savings, and improved long-term freedom from arrhythmia.”

HCA Florida MiamiCardiac Rhythm News
DMDr. Mark MetzlSection Chief, Cardiac Electrophysiology

“Our lab has published studies showing a 30% reduction in procedure time and a 14% improvement in long-term efficacy when using ensoETM. This important multicentre study will help us to further quantify effects in a wider range of practice across the USA.”

Endeavor HealthCardiac Rhythm News
DDDr. David SinghCo-principal investigator of the EVERCOOL AF study

“I've been using proactive oesophageal cooling for over two years now, and have been quite pleased with the safety and procedural efficiency that it offers, which in turn has increased our lab throughput to enable the treatment of more patients. I expect this new study will further quantify our experience.”

The Queen's Heart InstituteCardiac Rhythm News

Overview

Post-ablation chest pain remains common despite esophageal cooling; leaves open whether bilateral first-pass isolation reduces symptoms pending prospective trials.

Key Points

  • Identify patient and procedural characteristics associated with post-ablation gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and chest pain in individuals undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation with active esophageal cooling.
  • Analyzed 295 participants with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency ablation with active esophageal cooling who completed post-procedure questionnaires.
  • Assessed GERD symptoms using the GERDQ questionnaire (score ≥ 8 indicating high probability) at 7–14 days post-ablation, while querying chest pain separately.
  • Post-ablation GERD was identified in 14.9% (44/295) and chest pain in 24.1% (71/295) of participants, with anterior maximum ablation power being lower in those with GERD compared to those without (50.0 vs. 54.0 ± 14.0 W, p = 0.020).
  • Chest pain occurred significantly more often in younger individuals (64.5 ± 9.3 vs. 67.5 ± 10.2 years, p = 0.026), those with higher ejection fraction (57.1 ± 6.6% vs. 53.1 ± 10.2%, p = 0.001), and participants without bilateral first-pass isolation (59.2% vs. 72.6%, p = 0.033).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=295)

Structured PICO

P
Population
295 participants with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency ablation with active esophageal cooling, assessed at 7-14 days post-procedure.
E
Exposure
Radiofrequency ablation with active esophageal cooling
O
Outcome
Post-ablation gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (GERDQ score ≥ 8) and chest pain at 7-14 days post-procedurepatient reported

Despite active esophageal cooling during AF ablation, post-procedural chest pain and GERD remain common and are associated with specific patient and procedural factors such as younger age and lack of bilateral first-pass isolation.

Cite This Study

Silverstein et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=295). Radiofrequency ablation with active esophageal cooling was evaluated on Post-ablation GERD (GERDQ score ≥ 8) and chest pain. Among patients undergoing AF ablation with esophageal cooling, post-ablation chest pain occurred in 24.1% and was less common when bilateral first-pass isolation was achieved (59.2% vs 72.6%, p=0.033).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa7b17879e9260bc85aad57https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-026-02437-0
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reduced Post-Ablation Chest Pain with Active Esophageal Cooling2023 · 1 citations
  2. 2A Pilot Study of an Esophageal Cooling Device During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation2020 · 16 citations
  3. 3Active esophageal cooling during radiofrequency ablation of the left atrium: data review and update2022 · 15 citations
  4. 4An Esophageal Cooling Device During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation—A Comparison Between Reactive and Proactive Esophageal Cooling2022 · 12 citations
  5. 5Improved 1-year outcomes after active cooling during left atrial radiofrequency ablation2023 · 21 citations