Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Taguchi’s T-method is one of the Mahalanobis-Taguchi (MT) system proposed by Gen-ichi Taguchi. It is used for various forecasting purposes. The T-method is often compared to multiple regression analysis because the data type applied is the same in both methods. One advantage of the T-method over multiple regression analysis is its ability to deal with missing data. Unlike multiple regression analysis, the T-method can be analyzed without removing missing samples. In this study, we propose an improved method that further improves the accuracy of missing data while maintaining the features of the T-method. Specifically, we first improve the T-, Ta-, and Tb-methods using bootstrapping for data with missing values and then investigate a new method for dealing with missing data. Next, by calculating the prediction accuracy using simulations under various models, we examine whether there is a trend toward superiority or inferiority in multiple regression analysis, the T-, Ta-, and Tb-methods as well as in the improved methods over the T-, Ta-, and Tb-methods in the case of missing data. The results show that the improved Tb-method is more accurate than the conventional one, regardless of missing mechanisms. The improved T- and Ta-methods are more accurate in some cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujii et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: