Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
• Efficacy and safety of ALA-PDT was systematically reviewed for BCC, SCC, and BD. • Fifty-eight studies were assessed, including 40 for BCC, 9 for SCC, and 27 for BD. • ALA-PDT achieves favorable outcomes with high clearance rates and good cosmetics. • Response rates vary by lesion type, with relatively high recurrence rates for SCC. • Further trials are needed to optimize ALA-PDT protocols for the management of NMSC. 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) is used off-label in the US to treat basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and Bowen disease (BD). We performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of published ALA-PDT protocols for these conditions. A PubMed search was conducted through August 8, 2024, to identify studies evaluating 10% or 20% ALA-PDT in BCC, SCC, and BD. Randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case series with >5 patients were included. Quality assessment was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Fifty-eight studies were included in the analysis (BCC, n = 40; SCC, n = 9, BD, n = 27). Considerable heterogeneity was observed in ALA concentration, light sources, incubation times, and pretreatment strategies, precluding a standardized synthesis of outcomes. ALA-PDT achieved high clearance rates for superficial BCC and BD, with superior cosmetic outcomes compared to surgery or cryosurgery. Studies of ALA-PDT for SCC were limited with short follow-up times. Nodular BCC and SCC lesions demonstrated lower response rates, particularly with ALA-PDT monotherapy. Recurrence rates varied widely and were highest in patients with SCC. The most frequent adverse events were erythema, pain, and scaling. This review provides a comprehensive summary of evidence-based ALA-PDT protocols for BCC, BD, and SCC, but published protocols are heterogeneous without a clear consensus. While ALA-PDT is effective, safe, and cosmetically favorable for less invasive tumors, protocol variability underscores the need for further randomized controlled trials to determine optimal treatment parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeitouni et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: