Why the study?
Does endothelin-1 augment coronary vasoconstrictor responses in high-fat-fed prediabetic dogs compared to normal controls?
Does endothelin-1 augment coronary vasoconstrictor responses in high-fat-fed prediabetic dogs compared to normal controls?
Endothelin-mediated coronary vasoconstriction does not significantly contribute to coronary dysfunction at the early stage of prediabetes in a canine model.
Does not implicate ET-1 in early prediabetic coronary dysfunction; leaves open receptor changes in later disease progression.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present investigation was to test the hypothesis that coronary vasoconstrictor responses to endothelin-1 are augmented in the prediabetic metabolic syndrome. METHODS: ELISA was used to measure plasma endothelin-1 and intracoronary endothelin-1 dose-response experiments were conducted in vivo on normal control and high-fat-fed prediabetic dogs. Additionally, isolated left circumflex (LCX) coronary arteries and arterioles (< 160 microm) were used for in vitro functional studies and molecular analyses (quantitative real-time PCR and Western blotting). RESULTS: Plasma endothelin-1 concentrations were not different between control and prediabetic dogs. Coronary vasoconstriction to endothelin-1 was similar in control and prediabetic dogs, both in vivo and in isolated arterioles. Nonetheless, real-time PCR analysis revealed significant decreases in ET(A) receptor transcript levels in LCX coronary arteries and arterioles. Also, Western blotting revealed a significant decrease in ET(A) receptor protein in LCX coronary arteries. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present investigation indicate that although ET(A) receptor-signaling is sensitized by induction of the metabolic syndrome, endothelin-mediated coronary vasoconstriction does not significantly contribute to coronary dysfunction at this early stage of prediabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knudson et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: