Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Peer review is an essential mechanism for evaluating the judgment and performance of clinical providers. Reasons for conducting physician peer review range from identified quality-of-care concerns to general education. There are a variety of challenges to conducting an effective peer review, including the personal concerns of the peers conducting the reviews. This article reviews the potential uses of physician peer review, its basic methodologies, and challenges to and suggestions for obtaining effective peer review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wakefield et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: