Key result
Survey finds ~40% of clinicians report healthcare systems fail to deliver meaningful AF lifestyle modification.
Why the study?
Lifestyle and risk factor modification is central to AF management, but current clinical practice across EHRA countries needed assessment.
Cross-Sectional (n=258)
Yes
Delivering comprehensive lifestyle and risk factor modification in atrial fibrillation poses significant challenges, with healthcare professionals reporting low confidence in managing obesity, sleep-disordered breathing, and psychological distress, highlighting the need for healthcare infrastructure improvements.
Healthcare systems may hinder AF lifestyle modification delivery; leaves open infrastructure redesign and training needs.
AIMS: Lifestyle and risk factor modification (LRFM) forms a central pillar in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). This European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey aims to assess current clinical practice regarding LRFM across EHRA countries. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 31-item questionnaire was developed and distributed amongst healthcare professionals via the EHRA and social media, between 23 September and 21 October 2024. Of 258 respondents from 28 countries, 39.9% reported that their healthcare system is badly or very badly designed to deliver meaningful LRFM. Risk factors that respondents felt least confident managing included psychological distress (42.2% of respondents not confident), sleep-disordered breathing (33.8%), and obesity (22.4%). Respondents estimated that 70% of patients with AF at their institution may benefit from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation but that only 10% are referred for this. The most important barrier to cardiac rehabilitation in AF was identified as local programmes not accepting patients with AF only (42.1% of respondents). Despite 37.7% of respondents using a body mass index cut-off when deciding on catheter ablation suitability (with a mean cut-off of 36.7 ± 5.4 kg/m2), only 23.5% of patients with obesity are referred for formal dietary advice. Lack of patient motivation or engagement was identified as the most important barrier to weight loss (41.3% of respondents). Moreover, 89.6% of respondents routinely assess their patient's alcohol intake, whilst only 23.9% systemically assess for psychological distress and 16.5% for sleep-disordered breathing. CONCLUSION: Delivering comprehensive LRFM in AF poses significant challenges. Improvements to healthcare infrastructures are required to successfully implement meaningful LRFM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mills et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial Fibrillation (n=258). Lifestyle and risk factor modification (LRFM) practices was evaluated on Proportion of respondents reporting their healthcare system is badly or very badly designed to deliver meaningful LRFM. Among surveyed healthcare professionals, 39.9% reported their healthcare systems are poorly designed to deliver meaningful lifestyle and risk factor modification for patients with atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: