Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: This study investigated sex differences in, and the effect of protein supplementation on, whole-body protein turnover during a military field exercise. METHODS: Forty-four British Army trainees (14 women) completed a 36-h field exercise. Participants consumed their habitual diet ( n = 14 women [Women], protein intake 1.7 g·kg -1 ·d -1 ; n = 15 men [Men Controls], protein intake 1.6 g·kg -1 ·d -1 ) or the habitual diet and an additional 46.6 g·d -1 protein ( n = 15 men [Men Protein], protein intake 2.1 g·kg -1 ·d -1 ). Total 24-h whole-body protein turnover was measured using the [ 15 N]-glycine end-product method, and muscle protein breakdown was estimated from urinary 3MH:creatinine 24 h before, during, and 96 h after field exercise. Women and Men Protein were compared with Men Controls to examine the effect of sex and protein supplementation. RESULTS: Whole-body protein turnover, synthesis, breakdown, and balance, and 3MH:creatinine did not differ between time points ( P ≥ 0.056). Whole-body protein balance was higher and 3MH:creatinine was lower in Women than Men Controls (all time points, P ≤ 0.032), with no difference between sexes for other measures of protein turnover ( P ≥ 0.072). Men Protein and Men Controls were not different for any outcome ( P ≥ 0.060) but adjusted mean differences [95% confidence intervals] showed protein balance was 1.12 [0.28, 1.97] g·kg -1 ·d -1 higher in Men Protein than Men Controls during the field exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Women have higher whole-body protein balance than men in arduous training, likely due to higher energy balance. Protein supplementation may be effective for protecting whole-body protein balance in men.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Leary et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: