Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: This study examines how coaching strategies influence performance patterns in elite Italian football, comparing the possession-based "building-from-the-back" style with a direct approach. METHODS: Observational data from all 380 matches of the 2022-2023 Serie A season, sourced from a public online platform, were categorized by playing style based on goalkeeper distribution patterns. RESULTS: Teams favoring the "building-from-the-back" strategy (Group 1) achieved superior results compared to those adopting direct play (Group 2). On average, Group 1 earned more points (63.8±14.4 vs. 40.2±14.1, P<0.002), scored more goals (57.3±10.5 vs. 40.1±12.5, P=0.004), and conceded fewer (42.4±10.4 vs. 55.0±10.9, P=0.017). They also recorded a higher goal difference (+14.9 vs. -14.9, P=0.003), greater ball possession (53.1±4.3% vs. 46.9±5.0%, P=0.009), more shot-creating actions (906.6±128.4 vs. 777.9±133.2, P=0.041), and more goal-scoring actions (97.7±17.3 vs. 64.8±24.0, P=0.003). Logistic regression showed that teams using build-up play were 13.5 times more likely to qualify for European competitions (95% CI: 1.20-152.0), with six of the seven qualified teams adopting this style. Effect sizes across metrics were consistently large (Cohen's d: 0.94-1.65). CONCLUSIONS: Possession-oriented teams outperformed direct-play teams in both offensive and defensive indicators, underscoring the strategic role of coaches in orchestrating effective build-up play. These descriptive findings highlight how tactical choices are strongly associated with measurable outcomes in elite Italian football, offering data-driven insights for coaching methodologies and future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruscello et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: