This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
There is a great interest in the potential usefulness of biomedical tests in psychiatry, but basic statistical principles required for critical evaluation of their value remain poorly integrated into clinical thinking. We developed a useful scheme for organizing clinical test data so as to permit simple calculations of the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive power of medical tests. Some loss of predictive power is inherent in moving from artificial populations used for test development into more typical clinical settings, where prevalence is usually substantially lower.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ross J. Baldessarini (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: