Key result
Personal and contextual resources including supervisor support critically promote doctoral student well-being.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to perform a scoping review mapping critical resources required for doctoral programs across Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems and propose a holistic supportive model.
Systematic Review (n=68)
A holistic model of personal and contextual resources is proposed to enhance doctoral student well-being based on a scoping review of 68 articles.
Supports resource-oriented interventions in doctoral programs; extends well-being models for future interventional research.
Purpose This study aims to perform a scoping review of the recent studies on critical resources required for the doctoral program by mapping the resources at various levels of Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems and their underlying theories. The study proposes a holistic model of supportive resources in the doctoral education. Design/methodology/approach The current scoping review is supported by Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage methodological guidance The authors reported sixty-eight articles that were published between 2010 and 2023 and complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Findings The study identified two categories of resources that promote doctoral student well-being: personal resources such as research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation of the doctoral student. Second, the contextual resources provided by supervisors, department, family, peers, institution and Government policy impact the well-being of doctoral students. The study relied on the self-determination and conservation of resources theory to determine doctoral students' stress-free, high-quality research journey. Practical implications The study findings can help higher education institutions, supervisors, peers and academicians plan and implement the finest resources to improve the well-being of doctoral students. The institutions can develop a wide range of strategies, tailored supportive programs, and interventions that can help in improving students' mental and emotional health, based on the developed multifaceted resource framework. Doctoral students can also use the review's findings to help them deal with program obstacles by encouraging themselves internally and participating in mentoring programs. Originality/value This review article proposes a comprehensive conceptual framework by considering Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems on multilevel resources that help to understand the inter-relationship between resources required in the doctoral student's program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acharya et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Doctoral student well-being (n=68). Supportive resources (personal and contextual) was evaluated on Identification of resources promoting doctoral student well-being. A scoping review of 68 articles identified personal resources (e.g., self-efficacy) and contextual resources (e.g., supervisor support) as critical for promoting doctoral student well-being.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: