Key result
Combined sensory stimulation and therapist support reduces pain more than either alone in nursing home residents.
Why the study?
The combined effects of sensory stimulation and therapist support on older adults chronic pain, mental health, and well-being had not been investigated.
Does combined sensory stimulation and therapist support improve physical and mental health and reduce pain in older adults living in nursing homes compared to either intervention alone?
RCT (n=96)
Randomly assigned to 3 groups
No
Does combined sensory stimulation and therapist support improve physical and mental health and reduce pain in older adults living in nursing homes compared to either intervention alone?
Effect estimate: B=0.209 vs SS; B=0.23 vs TS
p-value: p=0.006 vs SS; 0.002 vs TS
Combined sensory stimulation and therapist support provides greater therapeutic benefits for pain management, physical, and mental health in nursing home residents compared to either intervention alone.
Supports combined sensory stimulation plus therapist support for pain relief in nursing homes; extends evidence for multimodal nonpharmacologic approaches in older adults.
BACKGROUND Increasing life expectancy has led to a rise in nursing home admissions, a context in which older adults often experience chronic physical and mental health conditions, chronic pain, and reduced well-being. Nonpharmacological approaches are especially important for managing older adults’ chronic pain, mental health conditions (such as anxiety and depression), and overall well-being, including sensory stimulation (SS) and therapist support (TS). However, the combined effects of SS and TS have not been investigated. OBJECTIVE This randomized controlled trial examines the specific and combined effects of brief SS and TS interventions on older adults’ physical and mental health and pain intensity levels, among individuals living in nursing homes. METHODS A total of 96 patients aged 65-99 years from a nursing home were randomly assigned to 3 groups: SS, TS, and combined SS+TS interventions, each delivered as four 20-minute sessions. SS was implemented using a multisensory Snoezelen room. Pain intensity levels (per a Visual Analog Scale), blood pressure, heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and hand grip strength (using a Jamar hand dynamometer) were measured before and after each of the 4 weekly therapeutic sessions. In addition, life satisfaction (per the Satisfaction with Life Scale) and anxiety (per the 7-item General Anxiety Disorder Scale) were evaluated before and after the whole intervention. Mixed model analyses tested the relative efficacy of the 3 interventions, applying simple slope analysis with Tukey correction. Study rationale and analytical plans were preregistered. RESULTS The combined intervention of SS and TS (SS+TS) resulted in reduced pain levels compared with SS (B=0.209, P=.006) and TS alone (B=0.23, P=.002) over 4 sessions (F₆,₂₆₆=2.62; P=.017; R²=0.23). Further, the combined SS+TS intervention resulted in reduced systolic blood pressure versus SS (B=0.09, P=.01) and TS alone (B=0.016, P<.001) groups (F₆,₂₇₂=5.42; P<.001; R²=0.29). In addition, the combined SS+TS intervention resulted in an increased grip strength versus SS (B=–0.35, P=.003) and TS alone (B=–0.032, P=.008) groups (F₆,₂₇₃=2.25; P=.04; R²=0.19). Moreover, combined SS+TS resulted in an improvement in life satisfaction (B=–4.29, P<.0001) compared with SS (B=–2.38, P=.0042) and TS alone (B=–1.20, P=.13) groups (F₂,₃₉=3.47; P=.04). Finally, SS+TS demonstrated greater improvement in symptoms of general anxiety disorder (B=10.64, P<.0001) compared with SS (B=3.30 P=.01) and TS alone (B=1.13, P=.37) (F₂,₃₈=13.5; P<.001) groups. No differences between the interventions were shown for blood oxygen saturation (F₆,₂₇₃=2.06; P=.06), diastolic blood pressure (F₆,₂₇₂=1.12; P=.35), and heart rate (F₆,₂₇₃=1.33; P=.23). CONCLUSIONS The combined intervention of SS and TS showed therapeutic benefits for pain management and physical and mental health of older adults living in nursing homes, relative to each therapeutic component in isolation. This brief intervention can be readily implemented to improve well-being and optimize therapeutic resources in nursing home settings. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05394389; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05394389
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khatib et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Older adults living in nursing homes (n=96). Combined sensory stimulation (SS) and therapist support (TS) vs. SS alone and TS alone was evaluated on Pain intensity levels (B=0.209 vs SS; B=0.23 vs TS, p=0.006 vs SS; 0.002 vs TS). Combined sensory stimulation and therapist support reduced pain levels compared with sensory stimulation (P=0.006) and therapist support alone (P=0.002) in nursing home residents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: