Key result
BPCI-A participation shows no association with spending changes for cardiac medical or procedural episodes.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether the Medicare Bundled Payments for Care Improvement – Advanced (BPCI-A) model was associated with spending reductions or quality improvements for cardiovascular medical events or procedures.
Does participation in the BPCI-A initiative reduce spending or improve clinical outcomes in Medicare patients with cardiovascular events or procedures?
Cohort
Yes
Does participation in the BPCI-A initiative reduce spending or improve clinical outcomes in Medicare patients with cardiovascular events or procedures?
Effect estimate: Differential change $16 (medical), $171 (procedural) (95% CI -$228 to $261 (medical), -$429 to $772 (procedural))
p-value: p=0.90 (medical), 0.58 (procedural)
Participation in the Medicare BPCI-A initiative was not associated with significant reductions in spending or improvements in clinical outcomes for cardiovascular events or procedures.
BPCI-A participation warrants no immediate practice changes in cardiac care; leaves open whether refined bundled payment models can achieve savings.
BACKGROUND: Bundled Payments for Care Improvement – Advanced (BPCI-A) is a Medicare initiative that aims to incentivize reductions in spending for episodes of care that start with a hospitalization and end 90 days after discharge. Cardiovascular disease, an important driver of Medicare spending, is one of the areas of focus BPCI-A. It is unknown whether BPCI-A is associated with spending reductions or quality improvements for the 3 cardiovascular medical events or 5 cardiovascular procedures in the model. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we conducted difference-in-differences analyses using Medicare claims for patients discharged between January 1, 2017, and September 30, 2019, to assess differences between BPCI-A hospitals and matched nonparticipating control hospitals. Our primary outcomes were the differential changes in spending, before versus after implementation of BPCI-A, for cardiac medical and procedural conditions at BPCI-A hospitals compared with controls. Secondary outcomes included changes in patient complexity, care utilization, healthy days at home, readmissions, and mortality. RESULTS: Baseline spending for cardiac medical episodes at BPCI-A hospitals was $25 606. The differential change in spending for cardiac medical episodes at BPCI-A versus control hospitals was $16 (95% CI, −$228 to $261; P =0.90). Baseline spending for cardiac procedural episodes at BPCI-A hospitals was $37 961. The differential change in spending for cardiac procedural episodes was $171 (95% CI, −$429 to $772; P =0.58). There were minimal differential changes in physicians’ care patterns such as the complexity of treated patients or in their care utilization. At BPCI-A versus control hospitals, there were no significant differential changes in rates of 90-day readmissions (differential change, 0.27% [95% CI, −0.25% to 0.80%] for medical episodes; differential change, 0.31% [95% CI, −0.98% to 1.60%] for procedural episodes) or mortality (differential change, −0.14% [95% CI, −0.50% to 0.23%] for medical episodes; differential change, −0.36% [95% CI, −1.25% to 0.54%] for procedural episodes). CONCLUSIONS: Participation in BPCI-A was not associated with spending reductions, changes in care utilization, or quality improvements for the cardiovascular medical events or procedures offered in the model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shashikumar et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular medical events and procedures. Bundled Payments for Care Improvement - Advanced (BPCI-A) vs. Matched nonparticipating control hospitals was evaluated on Differential changes in spending, before versus after implementation of BPCI-A, for cardiac medical and procedural conditions (Differential change $16 (medical), $171 (procedural), 95% CI -$228 to $261 (medical), -$429 to $772 (procedural), p=0.90 (medical), 0.58 (procedural)). Participation in the BPCI-A model was not associated with significant differential changes in spending for cardiac medical (change $16; P=0.90) or procedural episodes (change $171; P=0.58).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: