Key result
Restricted mean survival time modeling successfully translated 10-year atrial fibrillation risk into a time scale, with high-risk (>15%) patients having a predicted 8.8 years free of AF.
Why the study?
Existing risk prediction models for AF do not provide information regarding when AF might develop.
Does an RMST model effectively re-express individualized AF risk predictions into a time domain compared to standard Cox regression in AF-free individuals?
Cohort (n=7,586)
Does an RMST model effectively re-express individualized AF risk predictions into a time domain compared to standard Cox regression in AF-free individuals?
RMST can effectively translate 10-year AF risk probabilities into a time scale (mean time alive and free of AF), offering a complementary tool for clinical risk communication.
Background: Risk prediction models for atrial fibrillation (AF) do not give information about when AF might develop. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) quantifies risk into the time domain. Our objective was to use RMST to re-express individualized AF risk predictions. Methods and Results: We included AF-free participants from the Framingham Heart Study community-based cohorts. We predicted new-onset AF over 10-year follow-up according to baseline covariates: age, height, weight, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, current smoking, antihypertensive treatment, diabetes mellitus, prevalent heart failure, and prevalent myocardial infarction. First, we fitted a Cox regression model and estimated the 10-year predicted risk of AF. Second, we fitted an RMST model and estimated the predicted mean time free of AF and alive over a time horizon of 10 years. We included 7586 AF-free participants contributing to 11 088 examinations (mean age 61±11 years, 44% were men). During 10-year follow-up, 822 participants developed AF. The Cox and RMST models were in agreement regarding the direction, strength, and statistical significance of associations for all covariates. Low (<5%), intermediate (5%–15%), and high (>15%) 10-year predicted risk of AF corresponded to predicted mean time alive and free of AF of 9.9, 9.6, and 8.8 years, respectively. A 60-year-old woman with a body mass index of 25 kg/m 2 , no use of hypertension treatment and no history of heart failure had a predicted mean time alive and free of AF of 9.9 years, whereas a 70-year-old man with a body mass index of 30 kg/m 2 , use of hypertension treatment, and with prevalent heart failure had a predicted mean time alive and free of AF of 7.9 years. Conclusions: The RMST can be used to develop risk prediction models to express results in a time scale. RMST may offer a complementary risk communication tool for AF in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stærk et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=7,586). Restricted mean survival time (RMST) model vs. Cox regression model was evaluated on Predicted mean time free of AF and alive over a time horizon of 10 years. Restricted mean survival time modeling successfully translated 10-year atrial fibrillation risk into a time scale, with high-risk (>15%) patients having a predicted 8.8 years free of AF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: